In order to give your classmates more feedback on their projects, you will read/listen/view their projects, and comment on them by posting a comment here. Please use the following format:
Project: (the names of the people who designed the project)
Reviewer: (your names)
Give at least two pieces of warm feedback and at least two pieces of cool feedback in your post.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
100 comments:
Luminiscent
Delia and Joyce
1. Very creative
2. Really informative!
1.Looks similar to an examp website we were gived
2. Could have used videos or animations
Will Osborn Alice Xiao
-Includes mild humor that makes it more interesting.
-Nice Q & A format for most pages.
-URLs under pictures mess up text formatting, squeezes the text to the right of the page.
-Confusing picture at top of every page, what do geese have to do with your project, also, that picture is not cited.
Mackenzie and Bridgette
Johnny and George
Warm:
1. You guys had an interactive activity.
2. The bolding and coloring of the words make them seem important.
Cool:
1. The capitalization of some of the titles are hard to read.
2. The site could use more visual flavors and attractions. Pictures were fine though.
Ivy Li, Connie Xie and Thao Nguyen
Jonathan, Jacob
The pages were very cute and interactive which was nice.
Gives the reader an easy going sense.
Some pages however are too encyclopedia like.
A few pages however didn't have enough info pertaining to the subject
Pud-ding together the solar system
GOOD:
1. The jeapardy game was interesting and fun.
2.The layout of your project was creative and kept our attention
COOL:
1. Could have expanded the people and what they did with more detail
2. Each entry was a little vague. More detail would be helpful in understanding and helpful come time to play the game.
Janet & Grace
Project: Grace O'Brien
Reviewer: Pam, Mackenzie, Bridgette
Cool Comments: The title is somewhat difficult to distinguish. It is a little vague in some areas.
Warm comments: Your theme is pretty cool.
your pictures are very informative.
Project: Jillian Baker and Gabriella Gilbert
Reviewer: Izzy Abdus-Sabur
The website as a whole was pretty cool, I liked how you took the whole "atomic model" project idea and approached it from a funny standpoint; having the whole website be directed by the atom itself was a cool idea, and your attention to detail as far as the rest of the website goes was pretty good. Using all the videos in tandem made learning about it a whole lot easier than reading a giant block of text.
Other than that, thought, while the attempt to keep the website in 1st person was a nice gesture, it's a little confusing at times, and the grammar is thrown off consistently. Also, the quiz was not very interactive - perhaps having people actually put in answers, or having the answers right there on the page, something to make it easier and quicker.
Luminiscent
Grace Styklunas
1. Good creative and informative format
2. Easy and fun to follow.
1. Some images to help explain the experiments would be helpful.
2. It would be good to see the versions of atomic models the people theorized in the timeline.
Project: CJ Dullea and Patrick Logue
Reviewer: Bridgette pam, kenzie
cool comments: you should have had a game
warm comments:pretty colors
Chemistryandyou
Joyce and Delia
1.Good diagrams!
2.Q&A very informative
1. Too gray, could have used a more colorful format
2. A little bit like an encyclopedia
Will Byrne and Slater Ward
A-xizzle and Big Ozzy
Warm:
Really informational
Easy access to info
Cool:
Confusing banner at the top of every page, what do rainbows have to do with your project, also, that picture is not cited
Very technical, not a lot of attitude
The Atomic Scoop
GOOD:
1. Your website was so clever and fun!
2. I like your pictures, so creatuive
BAD:
1. A game would have been fun!
2. ......
Janet & Grace
Keynessa Nazaire
Neira and Zoe T.
1.A lot of pictures, intresting to look at
2. really detailed information, lots of information, shows a lot of understanding
1.could've made it more organized,
2. hard to follow the timeline very well
Chemistryandyou
Grace Styklunas
1. I like the Q&A format
2. pretty pictures and diagrams
1. kind of dull
2. not enough information about experiments
Jordan Yu
Peter Sweeney
Barbara Afogho
Hot
Nice introduction and funny calvin and hobbs cartoon that fits perfectly.
The tone of the website is informal with jokes which helps keep the readers attention.
Cold
It's kind of a lot of reading to do if you want to understand everything on the site.
More things that were interactive would have made this website 10x better.
Patrick and CJ
Warm
-Nice theme, cool colors.
-Good flow of information.
Cool
-Some pages have no text.
-Weird formatting for some pictures.
Atomic discoveries
Delia Joyce Grace S.
1. very prettu format
2. very professional and in depth
1. birds are very pretty but a little random
2. some paragraphs are boring to read
Johny and George Huynh
CJ and Patrick
The periodic trends section really solidified my knowledge of the periodic table. The images were really instructive. The drop down aspect of the topics was really cool. The site was really sleek and there isn't much room for improvement. I would definitely refer back to this for future projects.
George and Johnny - The Atomic Scoop
Viet Vu, Jason Huang, & Cindy Shaw
I liked the design of the website. I also liked #22 in your Bibliography, even though there really wasn't anything there. Viet didn't like how the navigation bar was on top, thus harder for someone to just navigate from page to page with ease. Cindy liked the theme of the website and how you guys used anime for the pictures and stuff to make it ore interesting. I think you should of asked permission from the people you used. I saw myself and I didn't ENJOY IT!!!! However, your diagrams. They were helpful and really got the point across without words.
Cindy Shaw and Jason Huang
Reviewer: Josh
-The jeopardy part of the site was really cool
-The fission and fusion examples were really funny
-It could be a bit more in depth in the people of importance section
-The sections are a bit vague
josh green
the site was not amazing
Follow the Yellow Brick Road to the Atom
GOOD:
1. The theme was very creative and we enjoyed following the yellow brick road.
2. All of your information was written in an interesting way. The two people talking got me interested.
COOL:
1. The plain font and white background made the website a little bland.
2. You could spice up the website with color and more pictures. Also add faces to your characters.
Janet & Grace
Slater and Will,
Very interesting and engaging site.
Many cool colors and pictures that catch your eye that keep your attention.
Spots with empty space but otherwise very good.
Atomic Model Time Travel
Joyce Delia Grace
1. time travel idea fun
2. really good images!
1. "gallery" a little random
2.pages are not set up in an easy to follow manner
Mackenzie and Bridget
It was okay, there werent too many colors so it wasn't very creative.
Word search was interesting but otherwise not exciting, very boring and encyclopedia like.
Cindy Shaw and Jason Huang
Johnny and George Huynh
Warm:
1. Interesting use of pictures (Dragon Ball Z + Yu-Gi-Oh card).
2. Jeopardy game (500 Misc.)
Cool:
1. Brief entries.
2. Doesn't cover too many topics.
Neira and Zoe T.
Jonathan and Jacob
1. It was well presented in format
2. The reader could really hear the voice of the author in the writing such as when you talked about Antoine Lavoisier
3. We would recommend that you ad more information to the pages as some of them are too thin
4. You could add in some of the experiments that the scientist had held which would make it easier to understand the findings
Josh Green
Peter Sweeney
Warm
-Got youtube to work at school
-Good flow of information, not like an ecycclopedia, colorful mulimedia
Cold
-site theme slightly grey/heard to navigate other
-otherwise the site was very good
Rose Silverman, Isabel DeLaura
Peter Sweeney
Barbara Afogho
Hot
The cover page was very nice and the yellow brick road made sense to use as a guide through learning about the atom.
Learning through a dialogue was a orginal and effective way of teaching the readers how the atom works.
Cool
Some of the pictures/videos did not load on our computer.
We could not find any interactive parts to your website. Videos would have been a nice touch too.
Jack Flaherty and Jonathan Ferrini
Warm:
Good use of imagery, useful pictures.
Provided good information on the subject.
Cool:
Could have included more about the subject.
Could be more interactive
Jonathan and Jack Flaherty
Jennifer&Katelyn :)
Warm:
*I liked how the info was condensed. Wasn't too wordy.
*The pictures were good and appropriate. "useful"-Katelyn
Cool:
*Confusing to navigate
*Could have been more in depth/had more topics
Jordan Yu
Natascha & Annie & Mei Ling
Warm:
1. Amusing language and we liked the comics
2. Liked the chronological order
Cool:
1. Multimedia was used, but creative other things were not (as in, no quizzes, vocab lists, etc.)
2. Only really covered experiments
pam and grace
1. WOW
2. pretty awesome dood
1. ALITTLE VAGUE
2. too welcoming lol
jack and jonathan
Warm:-Web Design is nicely done and is easy to navigate
-Shows understanding of the topics
Cool:-Could have included more topics
-could have been more interactive
Project: Daniel, Cassie
Reviwer: Anonymous
Warm: I like the colors you use, and it was very easy to read
Cool: put more information on it
Will Osborn
Natascha & Annie & Mei Ling
WARM:
1. Covers all the topics
2. Nice graphics!
COOL:
1. A bit encyclopedic :(
2. Only overviews all the topics
isabel and rose
1. roses are red, violets are blue, this projects speaks to you!:p
2. so intrestin and very CREATIVE
1. i dont think imin kansas anymore2. theres no place like home
Bridgette Collier and Mackenzie Lane
Warm
1. Great knowledge of the topic
2. Vast amounts of knowledge
Cool
1. Felt the word search was unusable
2. Could be more interactive
Bridgette Collier and Mackenzie Lane
by Jonathan Ferrini and Jack Flaherty
Warm
1. Great knowledge of the topic
2. Vast amounts of knowledge on various ideas
Cool
1. Felt the word search was unusable
2. Could be more interactive
Weiquan Mai & Kevin Zhu
Hot:
1) The conversations are short and to the point
2) The page is very eye-appealing
Cool:
1) How each conversation begins is rather redundant, maybe adding a bit more "pizaz" to each different conversation
2) Maybe some of the pages could've included a game show or make it more fun, not just repeated Q & A
ms. burns
1. lots of info on the topic
2. really nice pic
1. so many words, GAVE ME A HEADACHE
2.too many topics girl
Daniel and Cassandra
Natascha & Mei Ling & Annie
WARM:
1. I really like your Who Did What table!
2. Very good organization. The clicking-on-pictures part really helps to associate the reader with the names and faces.
COOL:
1. No real multimedia: only text and pictures
2. No review activity or section
Peter Sweeney, Josh Green
Cold:
-not much detail on chemists as people, makes it overly impersonal and dry
-not much on history of the evolution of the atomic model
Warm:
-very comprehensive
-lots of interactive elements, lots of explanatory videos
-very visual, makes easier to understand
Jenna and Abbie
Jennifer&Katelyn
Warm:
*Many topics to navigate through
*Nice sized font. Made it easy to read
Cool:
*could of explain pictures more
*Should have used a conversational style to your website. Not just straight facts
Keynessa
warm:
It was nice and well put together
Cold
It was a bit encyclopedic and hard to read.
Jennifer And Katelyn (Green)
by: Jack F, Jonathan F
Warm
1.Very funny use of Adam Savage and Memes - helped get the message across and was relatable to me.
2.Very good information along with the humor - very balanced.
COOL
1. Could've looked more like one of the science interest websites.
2. Should've been more interactive and aesthetic.
Jenn and Katelyn
Warm:-Good Pictures
-creative way of explaining topics
Cool:-Some of the info didnt show up
-N/A
Jack and Jonathon
warm: It was very scientific and impressive.
cold: It wasn't captivating enough.
Alice Xiao & Will Osborn
Warm:
1 Question commment concern area
2 Different ways to talk about each topic
Cool:
1 More color
2 hard to see topics immediatel
Wilna and Tobi
Natascha & Mei Ling & Annie
Warm:
1. Good organization and use of colors. Love the timeline!
2. The underlined vocab is good for review and association
Cool:
1. Pictures on the main page have no captions
2. Would have liked to see as much detail for all the topics as quantum numbers had
Really liked it though! :D
Warm: Very creative and fun
Ice cold: Could have been neater/better
Pictures weren't too firm
Dan and Cassandra
abby and jenna
warm: lots of nice pictures and very practical.
cold: excessive and lacked creativity.
Jenna and Abigail (Green)
by Jack F, Jonathan F.
Warm: Very interesting and IN YOUR FACE home page filled with informative pictures.
Pleasing aesthetics throughout the website - IT LEFT ME WANTING TO KNOW MORE!
Cool:
Organization could've been better.
A better explanation would've been key in a few of your pages.
Jordan Yu
Jennifer&Katelyn
Warm:
*I really like your website background
*The images were very appropriate and useful and the website was easy to navigate
Cool:
*The font isn't pleasing to the eye to me-Jen
*There was some unneeded information
Katelyn + Jennifer
Natascha & Mei Ling & Annie
WARM:
1. Love your home page, suuuper funsies! Yay for humor!
2. Fabulous use of pictures
COOL:
1. No use of multimedia
2. Nothing else it was pretty cool guys :3
Project: Phillip Voong, Aaron Wong
Reviewer: connie Xie, Ivy Li, Thao nguyen
Warm: very good information, good use of dialogue
Cold: maybe use a different font/more diagrams
Jonathan Philistin, Jacob Metz-Lerman
Cold:
-not much info on evolution of atomic model through history
-not much about experience of scientists in working on model or people themselves, makes it forgettable and dry
-lots of reading gets boring w/out changing it up a little
Hot:
-great visuals, nice videos
-plenty of material on modern chemistry/physics
-very detailed and comprehensive
-Calvin and Hobbes. Enough said.
Boring format
dope word search
Your really pretty
Abby and Mary
Jordan
Warm:-Very Detailed descriptions of topics
-Lots of pictures and videos
Jordan Yu (Green)
by Jack F, Jonathan F.
WARM:
Did it with no partner and still turned out a very big webpage. Equal to the work any group of two could've done.
Good use of appealing comic strip that draws the readers attention.
COOL:
Website setup could've been more like a general science interest website.
Black and white is never good for the entire webpage. It's informative, for sure, but should've been more... aesthetically appealing throughout.
Jordan Yu
Warm:
1) Comics are very interesting
2) Very informative
Cool:
1) A little too much writing
2) Not too eye-appealing
Connie + Ammany
Natascha & Mei Ling & Annie
WARM:
1. Awesome site name!
2. Good use of multimedia. Videos awesome!
3. Good organization of information
COOL:
1. You didn't make enough mistakes for us to have cool comments about!
aoife and jake
1. funny(loved the duck and bear) LOL
2. very creative and so much info
3. mustache WOW'D the audience
Abbie and Jenna
Warm:
Good visual aids.
Lot of topics discussed.
Cool:
Good have been more interactive.
Some information could have been better explained.
Jack and Jonathan
Natascha & Mei Ling & Annie
WARM:
1. Nice layout, eye-catching yet professional
2. Good graphics
COOL:
1. No videos :(
2. Mostly relied on pictures; not enough of your own notes
Viet Lam Vu, Barbera Afogho
Cold:
-missing a lot of material on the atomic model
-not many visuals on main site, skips a lot of details
-almost no information at all on chemists, who they were, and how they worked on the atomic model. Loses human aspect of chemistry.
Hot:
-gives short, concise information
-Prezi unique among peer projects visually; streamlined and relatively engaging, if a bit lengthy
-Viet Lam Vu
Johnny & George
Warm:
-good pictures & explanations
-it's fun
Michelle + Mabel
Natascha & Mei Ling & Annie
WARM:
1. Liked your bullet points
2. Concise information
COOL:
1. Didn't cover enough topics
2. Incorrect citations
Isabel D and Rose
JenCon&Katelyn
Warm:
*So creative :D
*Made it interesting to read
Cool:
*Should have changed the format
*The information pages should have been more colorful
Tobi and Wilna
Very good layout.
Bullet points at end helped.
Johnny George
Warm
that was great i loved the people awkward pic of Balicki classic
Good explanations
Johnny and George had a pretty swell website.
Warm: they had well organized topics with sub topics in each category. very aesthetically pleasing.
Cool: don't understand why its called the atomic scoop. there is nothing to do with ice cream. sadface.
Mike and Evan
Connie Xie, Ivy Li, Thao Nguyen
Warm: very cute drawings and engaging format with simple language.
Cool: You could go a little more in depth with the experiments.
reviewing: mike&evan
reviewers: rosalee&isabelly
boiling:
*we like the orange title
*adam the atom and nicki the nucleus were very clever and funny
ice cold:
*the grey and white title was distracting...was it a fading zebra?
* other than that, superb job!
Isabel and Rose
Mike and Evan
Warm: Very Good Idea
Lots of good Information
Cool: The front page would be cool if interactive and the google site is a wee bit unexciting
The Atomic Scoop by Johnny and George Huynh------------------
Warm: Using characters from pokemon and curious george was creative and entertaining.
Warm: Lots of pictures. Some were very helpful
Cool: Encyclopedic tone (babies don't know chemistry...rugrats lol)
Cool: I liked all the information but i think you need some more interactive aspects to your website
Ms. Styklunas and Ms. Rioles
Hallie Qiu & Michaella Jones
Warm:
-Vocabulary Words broadened our knowledge of the topic
-Very Clear analyses
Cool:
-the quizzes were not on the bottom of every page and made it slightly confusing
-the pictures were not consistent, some pages had them and some did not
the one above was Vaan and Leo's comment. we forgot to put names.
Project- Isabel Delaura and Rose Silverman
Reviewers- Grace, Abby, and Mary
The theme of the website was creative. The Wizard of Oz picture was cool. We liked how you used the characters throughout the website.
You could have used some more images. You could have been a bit more interactive.
Stanley Mui, Mather Hoyt
Warm: We liked the jokes in the intro and question and answer format.
Cool: Language is a little bit encyclopedic.
Project: Chemistryandyou by Viet Vu and Barbara Afogho
Reviewers: Gabriella Gilbert and Jillian Baker
Warm:
The subjects presented share useful basic information. Also, some of the pictures and text sizes used make it easier to read.
Cool:
The layout, and small text sizes are uninviting. If it was more consistent then it would be easier to follow. Some of the pictures don't show up and the quiz is also hard to follow.
Atomic cenchen
Cool:
too much background on the scientists.
Need more creativity, maybe animation...
Warm:
Very colorful and extremely informative
idea is intuitive and sophisticated
A-Quan & B-knight (andrew q. and ben c.)
Grace Mann and Janet Lam
Michaella Jones& Hallie Qiu
Warm:
-the end crossword+ matching game
-the layout/theme really drew us in
-the questions and answers were really intriguing and helped us understand the topics better
Cool:
-not all of the pictures loaded (could just be the computer)
Reviewees: Jonathan and jack
Reviewers: Mike and Evan
Warm: cool back ground. easy to navigate. too the point.
cool: not enough topics covered. limited information
Keeping it together. -Jordans Site
Vaan R.
Leo. G.
Warm: SO MUCH INFO!!! I LOVE IT.
Warm: a lot of pictures related to the information
Cool: Website was a little bland
Cool: More exciting background!!
Raymond Cen, Eric Chen
Warm: Layout was very clear and organized.
Cool: Not that engaging or creative.
jack f. and jonathan
1. hot layout ;)
2. informative
1. too few topics
2. lugubrious
kev-kev and geraldine
reviewing: mather&stanley
reviewers: rosalee&isabelly
boiling:
*the joke is very funny ionic bond hahahaha
*black backround very chic
ice cold:
*john dalton frowning? kinda depressing...
*could be mas interactive
reviewees: Dan and Cassandra
Reviewers: Mike and Evan
Warm: cool design. well organized, some good information
Cool:limited information on many topics.
Project- Mather Hoyt and Stanley Mui
Reviewers- Grace, Mary, and Abby
The pictures are interesting and there's a lot of information.
There could have been some games or a quiz.
Warm:
Very creative title and decorative site.
Very energetic and living videos
Ver informative
Cool:
more colors and styles on website
be more loose and informal. kind of stiff
A-Quan & B-Knight (A.Q and B.C)
Mather Hoyt and Stanley Mui
Michaella Jones& Hallie Qiu
Warm:
-the jokes reeled us in to the project and made us interested
-the pictures correlated to the topics in a great and informative way
Cool:
-the q&a's could have been more descriptive
-some topics had more information than the others, some were really limited
Alice and Will
Warm: Good format for website and I like the tabs. Good info presented.
Cool: Could have used a better tone of voice through out the website.
Kyle Kumasaka, Gaoyuan Liu
Ammany Ty, Connie Wong
Warm: The layout is clean and pretty. It was organized and I liked the color
Cool: The language was encyclopedic and a little hard to understand.
Welcome to the Atomic Model! Raymond Cen and Eric Chen
Vaan R.
Leo G.
Warm: COOL LAYOUT AND DESIGN!!
Warm: i like the review before the start of the quest
Cool: Lot of information that is not as organized as is it could be
Cool: encyclopedic
Evan Hanlon& Michael Murray
Michaella Jones& Hallie Qiu
Warm:
-names for questioner/eer were very creative and entertaining
-pictures made the topic more clear and concise
Cool:
-there was no background just q&a's
-poll didn't work
Reviewees: Jacob and Jonathan
Reviewers: Mike and Evan
Warm: good info, lovely video!
Cool: explain the significance of the pictures on the home page.
Website: Atomic Exploration by Peter Sweeney and Josh Green
Reviewer: Gabriella Gilbert and Jillian Baker
Warm:
Videos were helpful in adding to the understanding of the topics. The layout was nice, with the sidebar of each topic on every page.
Cool:
More original descriptions would show more of the understanding of the website creator. Though the layout was nice, the colors made it less interesting, along with the encyclopedia approach of descriptions.
michaela & hallie
1. hey gurl, this project is so smexy - i love the organization
2. LOVE the linkz to other sites
1. more interaction
2. unicorns
the girl opposite from you in chemistry and that kid with the blue t-shirt
Stanley and Mather
1. Love the pictures
straight and to the point :)
2. nothing bad to say
Keynessa Nazaire
Post a Comment